The Loyalty Tax

Your earliest customers are the ones most likely to leave you next.

I know. You think I've got that backwards. These people were there when nobody else believed in the product. They signed up when it had three features, and on a good day two of them even worked. They put you through a vendor review when no procurement team on Earth had ever heard your company's name. They carried you.

And you've been carrying them right back. For three years. On a grandfathered plan that hasn't moved while every new customer pays four times what they do.

You call it loyalty. Your customers call it a rate plan they barely remember signing up for.

The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Aniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.

Learn more

I worked with a founder last year who had 14 customers on an original pricing tier that was basically a fossil. $49 a month. They'd all signed up when the product launched in 2022. New accounts were paying $249 for the same thing, and a brand-new enterprise tier was running $899.

She'd been staring at that gap for 18 months. Every quarter, at the end of her financial review, she'd circle back to the $49 line and put it off for another 90 days. These people had carried her. She wasn't going to be the founder who slapped a price hike on the believers.

Before we talked about raising prices, I asked her to pull the engagement data on that cohort. Logins in the last 30 days. Feature usage. Support tickets. The same stuff you'd review before deciding whether to fire a bad-fit customer.

Nine of the 14 had not logged in for at least two months. Four of those nine had not logged in in six months. The highest usage in the group came from a guy who'd built a macro that pinged the API every four hours so his compliance officer would see activity on the dashboard. When we called him, he admitted he'd meant to cancel a year ago and kept forgetting. He also said he didn't think anyone else at his company was using the product anymore.

So here's what was happening. The people she was protecting with her loyalty discount were barely touching the software. They were paying a small enough number that canceling wasn't worth a Tuesday-afternoon to-do list. They were a Google Sheet line item with a checkbox next to it. "Believer" was the story she'd been telling herself.

I get it. Raising prices on the customers who showed up first feels like a betrayal. They said yes when the product was a Figma file and a prayer. (I would have felt the same way about touching it.)

But Paddle, the billing platform that runs subscription infrastructure for thousands of SaaS companies, has been mining the data on legacy rate plans for years. Their finding surprises most founders: grandfathered accounts leave at a higher rate than customers on current pricing, and the gap shows up year after year. ProfitWell's retention research points to the same pattern.

There's a reason. Price creates a relationship. A customer on $249 is paying for value they measured against an alternative. They logged in. They trained their team. They compared your product to three other options. They earned their way into that price, and the price earned its way into their budget.

A customer on $49 is paying for a decision they made three years ago and haven't revisited since. The relationship froze right after signup. Your product is whatever color the file cabinet used to be. They'll notice it the day they clean out the office, and then it's gone.

The cruelest part: your instinct to protect these customers is the thing that guaranteed they'd stop showing up. You kept them cheap because you didn't want to have the conversation. They disengaged because you never had it.

If you want to see how this breaks at scale, look at what AT&T did in January with their legacy unlimited plans. They raised prices. Fine. Every business does this eventually. The problem was how they did it.

Some customers got a $5 increase. Some got $10. Some got $20.

On the same plan.

The architecture underneath was a set of rate categories and flags that had accumulated over a decade of acquisitions, grandfathered deals, and pricing experiments nobody had written down. No AT&T employee could explain to any given household why the bill went up the specific amount it did. The phone reps couldn't either.

Subscribers started comparing notes on Reddit and found they were getting different increases on identical plans. The company ate 10 days of trending-topic outrage. Grandfathered accounts that had been paying them continuously for 15 years did something they'd never done before. They shopped around.

That's what happens when a loyalty tier turns into a data-integrity problem. The conversation you avoided becomes the scandal you can't control.

You are not AT&T. You have 14 customers on a plan that should have sunset two years ago. You can fix this in a month. You have to.

Costs rise. Clients delay. Pressure builds.

The Survival Hub gives you practical ways to respond from cutting costs to tightening operations and staying on top of revenue.

Built to help you take control when things feel uncertain.

Visit BELAY’s Survival Hub

The founders I've watched do this well all did roughly the same three things. GoSquared, the analytics company, published their version of this after sunsetting their own legacy tier. They'd spent years carrying early customers who had full Suite access for almost nothing. When they migrated, the majority upgraded to standard pricing, a smaller group shifted to reduced-functionality plans that matched their real usage, and a handful canceled. Their writeup reads like three commandments.

Thou shalt lead with value and skip the apology. The email opens with what's new. What's gotten better. Why the product is worth more than it was when the customer signed up. GoSquared framed their migration as "here is what your account unlocks now," not "we're sorry to do this." If you can't name three things that have changed since 2022, you have a different problem, and raising the price won't solve it.

Thou shalt give them runway and a choice. A minimum of 90 days notice. A longer grandfathered window for customers who've been with you more than two years is fair. A path to a lower-tier plan for customers who use the product less than they used to is kind. A respectful off-ramp for customers who want to leave is ethical. GoSquared built all three into their migration. So did New Relic, who staged their pricing overhaul as a gradual migration rather than a flip of the switch, which they credited with expanding account usage instead of driving retention backward. Cruelty looks like pretending none of these conversations are happening.

Thou shalt call the top 10 yourself. Actual phone, actual voice. Thou shalt get off thy ass and make the hard call. The founder who ran that $49 cohort got on the line with her five biggest legacy accounts before the email went out. Two of them thanked her for finally doing it. One asked if she was okay, because she hadn't returned a message in six months and they were worried the company was dying. One upgraded to enterprise right there on the call. One canceled politely, and she thanked him for three years of business. That's four relationships repaired and one clean ending. Compare that to where she was before, which was letting them drift.

The founder with the $49 cohort ran the migration last June. Five of the 14 canceled. Those were the ones who had forgotten they were paying her at all; the email reminded them and they did the thing they'd meant to do a year ago. Nine stayed.

Of the nine who stayed, six accepted the $249 tier without a complaint. Two shifted to a lower $99 plan that matched how they'd been using the product. One upgraded to enterprise. Her revenue from that cohort went up 68% after five accounts walked out the door.

More importantly, the nine who stayed are engaged again. They're logging in. They're opening support tickets. One of them wrote her a testimonial last month. The relationship restarted because the price forced them to face the question they'd been ignoring for two years: is this worth it?

Loyalty is the active, renewed decision a customer makes that you're worth paying for. If your pricing is built on the assumption that people won't face that question, your "loyal" accounts are ghosts on a rate plan.

Raise the price. Call the top 10. The ones who stay will be customers again. The ones who leave were already gone. You just hadn't sent them the invoice yet.